Read for yourself the translated text of The Gospel Of Judas, categorized as a Gnostic Gospel, which was orginally written in Coptic
After reading the text itself, I find the Gospel of Judas to be of no historical evidence whatsoever, the writings are so superstitious, without solid grounds and the Jesus here seemed to laugh a lot. The most irritating thing is that, there are so many lines missing!!! It actually irritates me at certain points to read an incomplete 'authentic' text!
If any sane christian finds this to be true, please explain what it means to me.
If this is true and some believe it should be in the bible, please explain how to put an 'authentic' but missing text content into a bible? So people are supposed to assume what its trying to say? To read something that's not there?
The bible is believed to be God breathed, so it's God inspired, God's Word...and let's assume this gospel is true and to be part of the bible, so God is asking us to fill in the blanks? So God speaks in missing sentences? Helloooooo?????
So what if it's proven to be authentic? That just proves that it was written at that timeline by someone but it doesnt prove the accounts to be true because no other documents / eye witness / historical events supported it. It was not even proven it was written by Judas Iscariot himself! Ohhhh people, please think lah...
But it does prove one thing, that the betrayal of Jesus did took place.